|
Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Furmark, Gears 5, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, PassMark, 3DMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or Intel Core i3-1115G4E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1115G4E | 51% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1115G4E | 51% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.8 | 90.8 | Valorant | 103.2 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.8 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 97.0 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.4 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 83.6 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.2 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.6 | 51.6 | Warzone | 80.5 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 86.7 | 86.7 | Valheim | 85.6 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1115G4E | 209% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1115G4E is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core since it has less power consumption: 20W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4E |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 578 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 390 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1428 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 768 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2982 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4E |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 2571 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 5966 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4E |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1254 | 652 | Multi-Core | 2732 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1115G4E |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | AM3+ | Core name | Tiger Lake | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 11 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 6 | Threads | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 3200 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 37% better than Core i3-1115G4E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 4 more core than Core i3-1115G4E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1115G4E is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 11 Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1115G4E and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1115G4E Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|