|
Intel Celeron N5205U vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Celeron N5205U vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as PCMark 10, Gears 5, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, WPrime, MATLAB. And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or Intel Celeron N5205U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5205U | 50% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, FX-6300 Six-Core is 1% better than Celeron N5205U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5205U | 51% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.8 | 90.8 | Valorant | 102.1 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.6 | Warzone | 79.6 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 86.7 | Valheim | 84.7 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5205U | 131% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5205U is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 91 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 241 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 196 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 585 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1556 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1277 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 3149 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 592 | 652 | Multi-Core | 1813 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5205U |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | December 11, 2019 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM3+ | Core name | Comet Lake | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 10 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 45% better than Celeron N5205U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 2 more core than Celeron N5205U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 26 Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Celeron N5205U and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5205U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|