|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-6442EQ vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, SuperPi, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Blender. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or Intel Core i5-6442EQ.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-6442EQ | 51% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-6442EQ | 51% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 90.8 | Valorant | 102.2 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 96.1 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.7 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.6 | Warzone | 79.7 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.9 | 86.7 | Valheim | 84.8 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-6442EQ | 73% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-6442EQ is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core as it consumes less power: 25W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 111 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 422 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 305 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 985 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 665 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2538 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1704 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 4505 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 550 | 652 | Multi-Core | 1907 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | November 30, -0001 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Embedded | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | AM3+ | Core name | Skylake | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 6 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 4 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 45% better than Core i5-6442EQ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 2 more core than Core i5-6442EQ. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6442EQ is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 24 However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-6442EQ and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-6442EQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|