|
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Handbrake, Blender, PassMark, RealBench, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, PCMark 10, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, SuperPi, Furmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of processors in: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or AMD Ryzen 5 4500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 4500 | 54% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 4500 is 5% better than FX-6300 Six-Core. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 4500 | 54% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.2 | 90.8 | Valorant | 108.2 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.6 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 101.7 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.2 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 87.7 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.7 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 54.1 | 51.6 | Warzone | 84.4 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 90.9 | 86.7 | Valheim | 89.8 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 4500 | 65% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 4500 is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 95W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 240 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1246 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 621 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2683 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1605 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 7862 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 3427 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 15834 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1282 | 652 | Multi-Core | 7095 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | April 04, 2022 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FP6 | AM3+ | Core name | Renoir | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 2 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | 3MB | 6MB | L3 cache | 8MB | 8MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000644 100-100000644BOX | FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 4500 is 2% better than FX-6300 Six-Core in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 4500 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 2 However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 4500 and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Core i5-2500K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|