|
Intel Core m3-8100Y vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core m3-8100Y vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like MATLAB, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, RealBench, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, WPrime, PCMark 10, 7zip. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or Intel Core m3-8100Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core m3-8100Y | 50% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, FX-6300 Six-Core is 1% better than Core m3-8100Y. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core m3-8100Y | 50% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.6 | 90.8 | Valorant | 101.8 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.0 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 95.7 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.4 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 82.5 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.3 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 50.9 | 51.6 | Warzone | 79.4 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.5 | 86.7 | Valheim | 84.5 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core m3-8100Y | 582% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core m3-8100Y is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core as it consumes less power: 5W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 93 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 176 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 231 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 412 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 411 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1509 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1784 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 3053 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 873 | 652 | Multi-Core | 1584 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core m3-8100Y |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | October 01, 2018 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM3+ | Core name | Amber Lake Y | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 8 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 6 | Threads | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 5700 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 95 W | Memory type | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 33.3 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 68% better than Core m3-8100Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 4 more core than Core m3-8100Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core m3-8100Y is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core m3-8100Y and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core m3-8100Y Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|