 |
Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-10900 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-10900 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, MATLAB, Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, 3DMark, Prime95.
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900 or Intel Core i5-13600T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13600T | 62% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600T is 9% better than Core i9-10900. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13600T | 57% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.8 | 99.0 | | Valorant | 114.5 | 112.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 63.0 | | Apex Legends | 107.6 | 105.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 84.4 | | Overwatch | 92.8 | 91.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 77.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 56.2 | | Warzone | 89.3 | 87.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 94.5 | | Valheim | 95.0 | 93.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13600T | 164% |
Core i9-10900 | 64% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 380 | 231 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3868 | 2541 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 626 | 529 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8582 | 6378 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2182 | 1367 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 24668 | 14816 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Single-Core | 1995 | 3126 | | Multi-Core | 42036 | 21216 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Single-Core | 1730 | 1265 | | Multi-Core | 12523 | 10761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900 | | Announcement date | March 18, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 10 | | Threads | 20 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600T is 17% better than Core i9-10900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600T has 4 more core than Core i9-10900. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600T is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900 is better: 3
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600T and Intel Core i9-10900 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-10900 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
|
|
|
