|
Intel Core i7-9800X vs Intel Core i9-10900 |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-9800X vs Intel Core i9-10900 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Gears 5, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, WPrime, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, MATLAB, Blender, Furmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900 or Intel Core i7-9800X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-9800X | 55% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900 is 1% better than Core i7-9800X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-9800X | 56% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.2 | 99.0 | Valorant | 112.7 | 112.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 63.0 | Apex Legends | 106.0 | 105.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 84.4 | Overwatch | 91.3 | 91.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.8 | 77.6 | DOOM Eternal | 56.4 | 56.2 | Warzone | 87.9 | 87.7 | Assassin's Creed | 94.7 | 94.5 | Valheim | 93.6 | 93.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-9800X | 28% |
Core i9-10900 | 64% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9800X since it has less power consumption: 165W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-9800X |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | | 231 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | | 2541 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | | 529 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | | 6378 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1271 | 1367 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13067 | 14816 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9800X |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Single-Core | 2664 | 3126 | Multi-Core | 18347 | 21216 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9800X |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Single-Core | 1393 | 1265 | Multi-Core | 10972 | 10761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-9800X |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Announcement date | October 01, 2018 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Skylake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 20 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 5600 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 85 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 16.5 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-9800X is 26% better than Core i9-10900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900 has 2 more core than Core i7-9800X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9800X is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900 is better: 16 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-9800X and Intel Core i9-10900 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-9800X Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
Intel Core i9-10900 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|