|
Intel Core i5-9500F vs Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-9500F vs Intel Core i9-8950HK tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PCMark 10, 7zip, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, Furmark, Gears 5. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-8950HK or Intel Core i5-9500F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-9500F | 53% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-9500F | 53% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.7 | 93.7 | Valorant | 106.4 | 106.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 59.6 | Apex Legends | 100.1 | 100.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.8 | 79.8 | Overwatch | 86.2 | 86.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.4 | 73.4 | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 53.2 | Warzone | 83.0 | 83.0 | Assassin's Creed | 89.4 | 89.4 | Valheim | 88.3 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-9500F | 61% |
Core i9-8950HK | 82% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-8950HK is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9500F since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 211 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1016 | 1269 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 344 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2640 | 3004 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 916 | 729 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6283 | 7064 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | Single-Core | 2716 | 2480 | Multi-Core | 10325 | 10640 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | Single-Core | 1197 | 1107 | Multi-Core | 5556 | 5554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | July 07, 2018 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 6 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 2000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 9 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9500F is 3% better than Core i9-8950HK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9500F is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-8950HK is better: 9 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-9500F and Intel Core i9-8950HK before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-9500F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-8950HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
| |
|