|
Intel Core i5-9500F vs Intel Core i7-9750H |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-9500F vs Intel Core i7-9750H tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Furmark, RealBench, WPrime, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9750H or Intel Core i5-9500F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-9500F | 53% |
Core i7-9750H | 53% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-9500F | 53% |
Core i7-9750H | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.7 | 94.2 | Valorant | 106.4 | 107.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 60.0 | Apex Legends | 100.1 | 100.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.8 | 80.3 | Overwatch | 86.2 | 86.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.4 | 73.9 | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 53.5 | Warzone | 83.0 | 83.5 | Assassin's Creed | 89.4 | 89.9 | Valheim | 88.3 | 88.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-9500F | 61% |
Core i7-9750H | 89% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-9750H is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9500F since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i7-9750H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1016 | 1182 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 441 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2640 | 2653 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 916 | 1113 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6283 | 6912 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i7-9750H | Single-Core | 2716 | 2487 | Multi-Core | 10325 | 11313 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i7-9750H | Single-Core | 1197 | 1203 | Multi-Core | 5556 | 6089 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-9500F |
Intel Core i7-9750H | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 6 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 5600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 9 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9500F is 13% better than Core i7-9750H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9500F is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9750H is better: 25 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-9500F and Intel Core i7-9750H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-9500F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i7-9750H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300U • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
| |
|