|
Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-10400 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-07-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-10400 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, Gears 5, PassMark, Furmark, Handbrake, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10400 or Intel Xeon W-10855M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon W-10855M | 54% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-10855M is 1% better than Core i5-10400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon W-10855M | 53% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.0 | 94.8 | Valorant | 108.0 | 107.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 60.3 | Apex Legends | 101.5 | 101.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 80.8 | Overwatch | 87.5 | 87.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.5 | 74.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 53.9 | Warzone | 84.2 | 84.0 | Assassin's Creed | 90.7 | 90.5 | Valheim | 89.6 | 89.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon W-10855M | 93% |
Core i5-10400 | 63% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-10855M is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10400 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 190 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1407 | 1341 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 175 | 450 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5437 | 3197 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 466 | 1110 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13137 | 7610 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 2801 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 13372 | 12503 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 1264 | 1245 | Multi-Core | 6885 | 6654 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop, Server | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2200 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10400 is 3% better than Xeon W-10855M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-10855M is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10400 is better: 6 However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon W-10855M and Intel Core i5-10400 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon W-10855M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i5-10400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|