|
Intel Core i3-10105F vs Intel Core i7-1160G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-10105F vs Intel Core i7-1160G7 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, AIDA64, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Furmark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, SuperPi, WPrime, Handbrake, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1160G7 or Intel Core i3-10105F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10105F | 52% |
Core i7-1160G7 | 53% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1160G7 is 1% better than Core i3-10105F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10105F | 52% |
Core i7-1160G7 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.8 | 93.4 | Valorant | 105.5 | 106.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.1 | 59.4 | Apex Legends | 99.2 | 99.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.1 | 79.6 | Overwatch | 85.4 | 86.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.8 | 73.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.7 | 53.1 | Warzone | 82.3 | 82.8 | Assassin's Creed | 88.6 | 89.2 | Valheim | 87.6 | 88.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10105F | 60% |
Core i7-1160G7 | 0% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10105F is more energy efficient than the Core i7-1160G7 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 0W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10105F |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 183 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1001 | 1091 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 434 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2284 | 2450 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1143 | 1053 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4441 | 6560 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10105F |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 | Single-Core | 2617 | 2865 | Multi-Core | 8868 | 11350 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10105F |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 | Single-Core | 1172 | 1526 | Multi-Core | 4732 | 5306 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCBGA1598 | Core name | Comet Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 2 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 8200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR4x-4267 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10105F is 67% better than Core i7-1160G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105F is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1160G7 is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-10105F and Intel Core i7-1160G7 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10105F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i7-1160G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|