|
Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i3-10105F |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i3-10105F tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, PassMark, Furmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, MATLAB, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10105F or Intel Core i5-1035G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1035G4 | 52% |
Core i3-10105F | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-1035G4 | 52% |
Core i3-10105F | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.5 | 92.8 | Valorant | 105.1 | 105.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.9 | 59.1 | Apex Legends | 98.8 | 99.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.8 | 79.1 | Overwatch | 85.1 | 85.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.5 | 72.8 | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 52.7 | Warzone | 82.0 | 82.3 | Assassin's Creed | 88.3 | 88.6 | Valheim | 87.2 | 87.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-1035G4 | 260% |
Core i3-10105F | 60% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1035G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10105F since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10105F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 172 | 191 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 657 | 1001 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 434 | 447 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1595 | 2284 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1092 | 1143 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4332 | 4441 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10105F | Single-Core | 2365 | 2617 | Multi-Core | 8380 | 8868 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10105F | Single-Core | 1172 | 1172 | Multi-Core | 4395 | 4732 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10105F | Announcement date | November 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1526 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Ice Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4800 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 58.3 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10105F is 70% better than Core i5-1035G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1035G4 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105F is better: 25 However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1035G4 and Intel Core i3-10105F before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-1035G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i3-10105F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|