|
Intel Core i5-4670R vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-4670R vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, PassMark, WPrime, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, MATLAB, Gears 5, 7zip, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Prime95. And how good the processors are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Core i5-4670R.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-4670R | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-4670R | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.4 | 90.0 | Valorant | 103.9 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.2 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 97.6 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.9 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 84.1 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.7 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 51.1 | Warzone | 81.0 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.3 | 85.9 | Valheim | 86.2 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-4670R | 57% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon PRO 300U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-4670R as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-4670R |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 145 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 549 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 336 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1232 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1040 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4152 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4670R |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 2142 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 5351 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4670R |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1113 | 746 | Multi-Core | 3348 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-4670R |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | July 07, 2013 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1364 | FP5 | Core name | Crystal Well | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 4 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2100 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR3 and DDR3L 1333/1600 at 1.5V | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-4670R is 20% better than Athlon PRO 300U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-4670R has 2 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-4670R is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 7 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-4670R and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-4670R Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i3-7350K
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|