|
Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, VeraCrypt, 7zip, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, PassMark, Handbrake, Prime95, Furmark, Gears 5. Gaming performance of processors in: - Valorant
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Core i5-L16G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 90.0 | Valorant | 102.2 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.9 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-L16G7 | 430% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-L16G7 is more energy efficient than the Athlon PRO 300U since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 107 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 251 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 577 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 794 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1923 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1605 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 3297 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 905 | 746 | Multi-Core | 1869 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-CSP1016 | FP5 | Core name | Lakefield | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 11 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 5 | 2 | Threads | 5 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X 4267 POP Memory | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 34 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon PRO 300U is 41% better than Core i5-L16G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-L16G7 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-L16G7 and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|