|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-6442EQ vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, WPrime, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Prime95, Handbrake, RealBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Core i5-6442EQ.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-6442EQ | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-6442EQ | 51% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 90.0 | Valorant | 102.2 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 96.1 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.7 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 85.9 | 85.9 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-6442EQ | 73% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon PRO 300U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6442EQ since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 111 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 422 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 305 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 985 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 665 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2538 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1704 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 4505 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 550 | 746 | Multi-Core | 1907 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | November 30, -0001 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Embedded | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FP5 | Core name | Skylake | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 6 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon PRO 300U is 20% better than Core i5-6442EQ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-6442EQ has 2 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6442EQ is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 20 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-6442EQ and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-6442EQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|