|
Intel Celeron N5205U vs Intel Pentium N6415 |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Celeron N5205U vs Intel Pentium N6415 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, Gears 5, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Handbrake, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, RealBench, Prime95, SuperPi. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium N6415 or Intel Celeron N5205U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5205U | 50% |
Pentium N6415 | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Pentium N6415 is 1% better than Celeron N5205U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5205U | 51% |
Pentium N6415 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.8 | 89.4 | Valorant | 102.1 | 101.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 56.9 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.2 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 82.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.1 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.8 | Warzone | 79.6 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.4 | Valheim | 84.7 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5205U | 131% |
Pentium N6415 | 378% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium N6415 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5205U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 91 | 122 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 241 | 440 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 196 | 207 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 585 | 679 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 514 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1556 | 1896 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 1277 | 1976 | Multi-Core | 3149 | 3840 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 592 | 681 | Multi-Core | 1813 | 1416 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Announcement date | December 11, 2019 | January 01, 2016 | Type | Laptop | Embedded | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1493 | Core name | Comet Lake | Elkhart Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 6 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron N5205U is 36% better than Pentium N6415 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium N6415 is better: 13 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5205U and Intel Pentium N6415 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5205U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Pentium N6415 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|