Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron N5205U gaming benchmark

Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron N5205U

Processor comparisons   20-01-2022
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron N5205U and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as SuperPi, 3DMark, PassMark, Gears 5, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Geekbench 5.2, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Fallout 76
  • Overwatch
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Death Stranding
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Last Man Standing
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Apex Legends
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Halo Infinite
  • Valheim
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Valorant
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Fortnite
  • Borderlands 3
  • DOOM: Eternal

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5205U or Intel Core i3-7167U.

 
Intel Core i3-7167U
Intel Celeron N5205U

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

Processor Benchmark
Core i3-7167U51% Celeron N5205U51%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i3-7167U51% Celeron N5205U51%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite90.790.8
Valorant103.1103.2
Cyberpunk 207757.757.8
Apex Legends96.997.0
Call of Duty Warzone77.377.4
Overwatch83.583.6
Red Dead Redemption 271.171.2
DOOM Eternal51.651.6
Warzone80.480.5
Assassin's Creed86.686.7
Valheim85.685.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i3-7167U94% Celeron N5205U131%
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5205U is more energy efficient than the Core i3-7167U since it has less power consumption: 28W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.


Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i3-7167U Intel Celeron N5205U
Cinbench 15 Single-core12091
Cinbench 15 Multi-core306241
Cinbench 20 Single-core267196
Cinbench 20 Multi-core629585
Cinbench 23 Single-core448424
Cinbench 23 Multi-core17391556

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-7167U Intel Celeron N5205U
Single-Core18521277
Multi-Core34783149

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-7167U Intel Celeron N5205U
Single-Core793592
Multi-Core17721813

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

Intel Core i3-7167U Intel Celeron N5205U
Announcement dateMarch 07, 2017December 11, 2019
TypeLaptopLaptop
SocketUnknownFCBGA1528
Core nameKaby LakeComet Lake
Architecturex86x86
Generation710
Turbo Frequency2.2 MHz
Frequency2.8 MHz1.9 MHz
Cores24
Threads44
Bus rate4 GT/s4 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm14 nm
Transistors count1700 millions1900 millions
Power consumption (TDP)28 W15 W
Memory typeDDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
Max. Memory32 Gb64 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s37.5 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache3 MB2 MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part numberExpansion Options
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7167U is 32% better than Celeron N5205U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5205U has 2 more core than Core i3-7167U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7167U is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 18
   However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-7167U and Intel Celeron N5205U before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Pentium Gold G7400E Vs Celeron N5205U
• Pentium Gold G7400TE Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Athlon Gold 3150U Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU SoCs li..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Devices..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Benchma..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU PUBG mo..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Fortnit..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G6..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G6..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..