 |
Intel Core i3-10110U vs Intel Celeron N5205U |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-10110U vs Intel Celeron N5205U and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, Blender, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5205U or Intel Core i3-10110U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10110U | 51% |
Celeron N5205U | 50% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-10110U is 1% better than Celeron N5205U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10110U | 51% |
Celeron N5205U | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.1 | 89.8 | Valorant | 102.4 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 70.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.0 | 85.8 | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10110U | 192% |
Celeron N5205U | 131% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10110U is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5205U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10110U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 91 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 405 | 241 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 318 | 196 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 559 | 585 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 526 | 424 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2042 | 1556 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Single-Core | 2364 | 1277 | Multi-Core | 4084 | 3149 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Single-Core | 868 | 592 | Multi-Core | 2101 | 1813 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Announcement date | November 07, 2019 | December 11, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1528 | Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 1.9 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 1900 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10110U is 9% better than Celeron N5205U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5205U has 2 more core than Core i3-10110U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10110U is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 3 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-10110U and Intel Celeron N5205U before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10110U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
Intel Celeron N5205U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|