|
Intel Core i5-6287U vs Intel Celeron N5205U |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-6287U vs Intel Celeron N5205U and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, AIDA64, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Blender, UserBenchmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, PassMark, 3DMark, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Blender, MATLAB, WPrime, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5205U or Intel Core i5-6287U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-6287U | 51% |
Celeron N5205U | 50% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-6287U is 1% better than Celeron N5205U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-6287U | 51% |
Celeron N5205U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.1 | 89.8 | Valorant | 102.3 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.3 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.2 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 82.9 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.6 | 70.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.8 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.0 | 85.8 | Valheim | 84.9 | 84.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-6287U | 98% |
Celeron N5205U | 131% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5205U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6287U as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6287U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 91 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 357 | 241 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 267 | 196 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 939 | 585 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 634 | 424 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2346 | 1556 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6287U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Single-Core | 2009 | 1277 | Multi-Core | 3792 | 3149 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6287U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Single-Core | 827 | 592 | Multi-Core | 2023 | 1813 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-6287U |
Intel Celeron N5205U | Announcement date | November 07, 2015 | December 11, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1356 | FCBGA1528 | Core name | Skylake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 6 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 1.9 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 1900 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6287U is 38% better than Celeron N5205U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5205U has 2 more core than Core i5-6287U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6287U is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 7 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-6287U and Intel Celeron N5205U before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-6287U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Celeron N5205U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|