|
Intel Celeron N5205U vs Intel Celeron N5095 |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Celeron N5205U vs Intel Celeron N5095 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Furmark, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, Handbrake, Blender, AIDA64, 7zip, Gears 5, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, RealBench. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5095 or Intel Celeron N5205U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5205U | 50% |
Celeron N5095 | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron N5095 is 1% better than Celeron N5205U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5205U | 51% |
Celeron N5095 | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.8 | 90.2 | Valorant | 102.1 | 102.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.4 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 96.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.8 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 83.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.7 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.2 | Warzone | 79.6 | 79.9 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 86.1 | Valheim | 84.7 | 85.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5205U | 131% |
Celeron N5095 | 132% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5095 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5205U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 91 | 103 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 241 | 273 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 196 | 222 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 585 | 663 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 481 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1556 | 1764 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Single-Core | 1277 | 1448 | Multi-Core | 3149 | 3571 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Single-Core | 592 | 597 | Multi-Core | 1813 | 2119 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron N5205U |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Announcement date | December 11, 2019 | January 11, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1338 | Core name | Comet Lake | Jasper Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron N5095 is 5% better than Celeron N5205U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5205U is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 27 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5205U and Intel Celeron N5095 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5205U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|