Comparisons 01-06-2021
Detailed compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 780G or Snapdragon 888.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Snapdragon 888 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Snapdragon 888 | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Snapdragon 888 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 780G |
Snapdragon 888 | | Total score | 718020 | 719358 | | CPU | 91177 | 215138 | | GPU | 113501 | 268153 | | MEM | 52158 | 123249 | | UX | 47521 | 111968 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 780G |
Snapdragon 888 | | Single-Core | 1608 | 1169 | | Multi-Core | 5467 | 3687 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 780G |
Snapdragon 888 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2840 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 2750 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 is 15% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 660 | | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 986 | 1486 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 384 | 512 | | Display | 3360 x 1600 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 84.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 51.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 47.3 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 72.2 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 105.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 64.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 67.5 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 72.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 75.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 72.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GNSS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, GPS, NavIC, NavIC enabled, Beidou, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
