Comparisons 01-06-2021
Detailed comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Samsung Exynos 990, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 780G or Exynos 990.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Exynos 990 | 93% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Exynos 990 | 75% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Exynos 990 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 990 | | Total score | 718020 | 520426 | | CPU | 91177 | 150964 | | GPU | 113501 | 211669 | | MEM | 52158 | 82183 | | UX | 47521 | 75906 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 990 | | Single-Core | 1608 | 1108 | | Multi-Core | 5467 | 3435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 990 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3300 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.93 GHz Exynos M5 Mongoose
2x2.56 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 990 is 27% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G77 MP11 | | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 986 | 786 | | # of Cores | | 11 | | # of Shader Units | 384 | | | Display | 3360 x 1600 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 61.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 55.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 61.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 61.7 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 49.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 75.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 123 | | Sniper 3D | | 116.9 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 86.1 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 80 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 80 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 108 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 25 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 3486 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 990 is better: 23
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 990
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 990
|
