Comparisons 01-06-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 780G or Kirin 985.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Kirin 985 | 82% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 780G |
Kirin 985 | | Total score | 718020 | 423580 | | CPU | 91177 | 134631 | | GPU | 113501 | 142013 | | MEM | 52158 | 79179 | | UX | 47521 | 67029 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 780G |
Kirin 985 | | Single-Core | 1608 | 880 | | Multi-Core | 5467 | 2995 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 780G |
Kirin 985 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2580 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 34.1 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 985 is 6% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G77 MP8 | | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 986 | 628 | | # of Cores | | 8 | | # of Shader Units | 384 | | | Display | 3360 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 54.1 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.2 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 41.2 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 45.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 75.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 98.4 | | Sniper 3D | | 106.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 89.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 73.1 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 73.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 32 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | 21 | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 1277 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 175 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 21
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 19
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 985
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Apple A12X Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
|
