Comparisons 27-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Mediatek Dimensity 810 or Snapdragon 780G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 68% |
Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 72% |
Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 66% |
Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Total score | 400983 | 718020 | | CPU | 110206 | 91177 | | GPU | 94592 | 113501 | | MEM | 71802 | 52158 | | UX | 62662 | 47521 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Single-Core | 898 | 1608 | | Multi-Core | 3054 | 5467 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4666 | | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 17 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 512 KB | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | | L3 cache | | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 | | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz | | GFloPS | 486 | 986 | | # of Cores | 2 | | | # of Shader Units | | 384 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3360 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 64 MP | 192 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1250 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 810 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
|
