|
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Helio P90 |
|
Comparisons 03-12-2021 Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Helio P90, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Helio G37 or Helio P90.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Helio G37 | 8% |
Helio P90 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Helio G37 | 67% |
Helio P90 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Helio G37 | 6% |
Helio P90 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Helio G37 |
Helio P90 | Total score | 118132 | 166210 | CPU | 33082 | 46539 | GPU | 44885 | 63167 | MEM | 18894 | 26589 | UX | 21266 | 29921 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Helio G37 |
Helio P90 | Single-Core | 241 | 340 | Multi-Core | 1063 | 1430 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Helio G37 |
Helio P90 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 3733 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Helio G37 is 12% better than Helio P90 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 247.35 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 23.6 | 20.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.9 | 24.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 48.9 | 54.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.3 | 27.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 40.5 | 21.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.9 | 30.2 | Real Racing 3 | 84.8 | 108.8 | Sniper 3D | 106.5 | 103.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 57.6 | 97.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 70.3 | 87 | CSR Racing 2 | 57.3 | 76.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Beidou, Glonass | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G37 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P90 is better: 25 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Helio G37 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Helio P90 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|