|
AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon W-1290T |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon W-1290T and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, WPrime, PassMark, Blender, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, SuperPi, RealBench, Gears 5, Handbrake, 3DMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-1290T or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7473X | 67% |
Xeon W-1290T | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 17% better than Xeon W-1290T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7473X | 74% |
Xeon W-1290T | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 130.7 | 96.5 | Valorant | 148.5 | 109.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 103.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 120.3 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 75.7 | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 54.8 | Warzone | 115.8 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 92.1 | Valheim | 123.3 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7473X | 20% |
Xeon W-1290T | 124% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-1290T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7473X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 3171 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 7463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 640 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 18031 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 1812 | 2944 | Multi-Core | 58245 | 18353 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 1489 | 1308 | Multi-Core | 41864 | 8329 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Milan | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 1.9 MHz | Cores | 24 | 10 | Threads | 48 | 20 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000507 100-000000507​WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7473X is 32% better than Xeon W-1290T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7473X has 14 more core than Xeon W-1290T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-1290T is better: 8 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7473X and Intel Xeon W-1290T before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-1290T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|