|
AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon W-1290T |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon W-1290T tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, RealBench, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, Gears 5, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Blender, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-1290T or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7773X | 74% |
Xeon W-1290T | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 25% better than Xeon W-1290T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7773X | 80% |
Xeon W-1290T | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 142.2 | 96.5 | Valorant | 161.6 | 109.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 103.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 130.9 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 75.7 | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 54.8 | Warzone | 126.0 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 92.1 | Valheim | 134.1 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7773X | 16% |
Xeon W-1290T | 124% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-1290T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 3171 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 7463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 640 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 18031 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 2797 | 2944 | Multi-Core | 79901 | 18353 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 1385 | 1308 | Multi-Core | 53124 | 8329 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Milan | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 1.9 MHz | Cores | 64 | 10 | Threads | 128 | 20 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000504 100-000000504​WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7773X is 13% better than Xeon W-1290T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 54 more core than Xeon W-1290T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-1290T is better: 9 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7773X and Intel Xeon W-1290T before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-1290T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|