 |
AMD EPYC 9334 vs AMD EPYC 9124 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9334 vs AMD EPYC 9124 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AIDA64, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Gears 5, Prime95, MATLAB, Blender, VeraCrypt, 7zip, PassMark, Handbrake, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Furmark, WPrime, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9124 or AMD EPYC 9334.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9334 | 70% |
EPYC 9124 | 62% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9334 is 11% better than EPYC 9124. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9334 | 75% |
EPYC 9124 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 132.6 | 112.7 | | Valorant | 150.7 | 128.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.4 | 71.7 | | Apex Legends | 141.6 | 120.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.0 | 96.0 | | Overwatch | 122.0 | 103.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.0 | 88.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 64.0 | | Warzone | 117.5 | 99.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 126.6 | 107.5 | | Valheim | 125.0 | 106.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9334 | 35% |
EPYC 9124 | 20% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9124 since it has less power consumption: 210W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 156 | 110 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8366 | 5178 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 334 | 220 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17782 | 10991 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 896 | 566 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46317 | 28606 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 2073 | 1293 | | Multi-Core | 67962 | 41968 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 2209 | 1206 | | Multi-Core | 43703 | 24169 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 16 | | Threads | 64 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 210 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000800
100-100000800WOF | 100-000000802
100-100000802WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9124 is 9% better than EPYC 9334 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9334 has 16 more core than EPYC 9124. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9124 is better: 3
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9334 and AMD EPYC 9124 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9124 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
