 |
AMD EPYC 7252 vs Intel Xeon W-2235 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7252 vs Intel Xeon W-2235 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, AIDA64, Blender, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-2235 or AMD EPYC 7252.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7252 | 55% |
Xeon W-2235 | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7252 is 1% better than Xeon W-2235. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7252 | 58% |
Xeon W-2235 | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 94.9 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 107.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 60.4 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 101.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 80.9 | | Overwatch | 95.1 | 87.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.0 | 74.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 53.9 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 84.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 90.6 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 89.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7252 | 27% |
Xeon W-2235 | 31% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-2235 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7252 as it consumes less power: 120W vs. 130W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 242 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1856 | 1514 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 433 | 188 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4126 | 5853 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1482 | 502 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11071 | 14141 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 2638 | | Multi-Core | 19724 | 14394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | | Single-Core | 1001 | 1210 | | Multi-Core | 15066 | 6788 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7252 |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA2066 | | Core name | Rome | Cascade Lake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 4130 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 120 W | 130 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 2933 | | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 85 GByte/s | 93.85 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 8.25 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000080
100-100000080WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-2235 is 18% better than EPYC 7252 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7252 has 2 more core than Xeon W-2235. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7252 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-2235 is better: 11
Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7252 and Intel Xeon W-2235 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7252 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-2235 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
