|
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Intel Xeon W-2235 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Intel Xeon W-2235 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AIDA64, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Gears 5, Prime95, MATLAB, Blender, VeraCrypt, 7zip, PassMark, Handbrake, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Furmark, WPrime, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi. And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-2235 or Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 52% |
Xeon W-2235 | 54% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-2235 is 3% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Bronze 3408U | 54% |
Xeon W-2235 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.0 | 94.9 | Valorant | 109.1 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.1 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 102.6 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.8 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 88.4 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.3 | 74.4 | DOOM Eternal | 54.6 | 53.9 | Warzone | 85.1 | 84.1 | Assassin's Creed | 91.6 | 90.6 | Valheim | 90.6 | 89.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 20% |
Xeon W-2235 | 31% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-2235 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Bronze 3408U as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 130W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 161 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 759 | 1514 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 188 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1693 | 5853 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 502 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4251 | 14141 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Single-Core | 122 | 2638 | Multi-Core | 8325 | 14394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Single-Core | 786 | 1210 | Multi-Core | 7851 | 6788 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Announcement date | March 23, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 8 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 4130 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 130 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 2933 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 93.85 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 8.25 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-2235 is 52% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Bronze 3408U has 2 more core than Xeon W-2235. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-2235 is better: 13 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U and Intel Xeon W-2235 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-2235 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|