Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Xeon W-2235

Processor comparisons   10-01-2022
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Xeon W-2235 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, Blender, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Cyberpunk 2077
Borderlands 3
Fortnite
Halo Infinite
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Valheim
Overwatch
Grand Theft Auto V
Apex Legends
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Watch Dogs Legion
DOOM: Eternal
Valorant
Rainbow Six Siege
Last Man Standing
Death Stranding
Fallout 76
Red Dead Redemption 2

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-2235 or Intel Celeron 7305.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Celeron 7305

54%

Xeon W-2235

54%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Celeron 7305

53%

Xeon W-2235

53%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	93.4	94.9
Valorant	106.2	107.9
Cyberpunk 2077	59.4	60.4
Apex Legends	99.8	101.4
Call of Duty Warzone	79.6	80.9
Overwatch	86.0	87.4
Red Dead Redemption 2	73.2	74.4
DOOM Eternal	53.1	53.9
Warzone	82.8	84.1
Assassin's Creed	89.2	90.6
Valheim	88.1	89.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Celeron 7305

212%

Xeon W-2235

31%

To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron 7305 is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-2235 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 130W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Celeron 7305	Intel Xeon W-2235
Cinbench 15 Single-core	177	206
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	1293	1514
Cinbench 20 Single-core	423	188
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	2936	5853
Cinbench 23 Single-core	992	502
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	9678	14141

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Celeron 7305	Intel Xeon W-2235
Single-Core	2321	2638
Multi-Core	13548	14394

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Celeron 7305	Intel Xeon W-2235
Single-Core	957	1210
Multi-Core	5313	6788

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	Intel Celeron 7305	Intel Xeon W-2235
Announcement date	January 07, 2022	April 01, 2020
Type	Laptop	Server
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCLGA2066
Core name	Alder Lake-U	Cascade Lake
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	12	3
Turbo Frequency	1.1 MHz	4.6 MHz
Frequency	0.9 MHz	3.8 MHz
Cores	5	6
Threads	6	12
Bus rate	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	10 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	8200 millions	4130 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	15 W	130 W
Memory type	Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s	DDR4 2933
Max. Memory	32 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth	45.8 GB/s	93.85 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	24 MB	8.25 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	Yes
Part number

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-2235 is 76% better than Celeron 7305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-2235 has 1 more core than Celeron 7305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 7305 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-2235 is better: 26
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Celeron 7305 and Intel Xeon W-2235 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

Intel Celeron 7305 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Celeron 7305 specs and review.

• Intel Xeon W-2235 specs and review.