|
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7F32 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7F32 and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, AIDA64, Blender, UserBenchmark, Furmark, WPrime, Gears 5, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Handbrake, SuperPi, 3DMark, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F32 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 7F32 | 56% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 21% better than EPYC 7F32. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 7F32 | 61% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.3 | 108.2 | Valorant | 152.7 | 122.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 68.8 | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 115.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 92.2 | Overwatch | 123.7 | 99.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 84.8 | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 61.5 | Warzone | 119.1 | 95.9 | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 103.3 | Valheim | 126.7 | 102.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 7F32 | 22% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F32 as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 67 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 2750 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 446 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 5829 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 308 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 15159 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Single-Core | 2177 | 2422 | Multi-Core | 70650 | 22236 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Single-Core | 2319 | 1209 | Multi-Core | 45439 | 19778 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Rome | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 32 | 8 | Threads | 64 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 38000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | 100-000000139 100-000000139WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 3% better than EPYC 7F32 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9374F has 24 more core than EPYC 7F32. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F32 is better: 4 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 7F32 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F32 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|