 |
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7413 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7413 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 7zip, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Handbrake, RealBench, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, SuperPi, AIDA64, Blender, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7413 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 7413 | 66% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 7% better than EPYC 7413. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 7413 | 74% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.3 | 130.7 | | Valorant | 152.7 | 148.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 83.2 | | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 139.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 111.4 | | Overwatch | 123.7 | 120.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 102.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 74.3 | | Warzone | 119.1 | 115.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 124.7 | | Valheim | 126.7 | 123.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 7413 | 24% |
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7413 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 155 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 6534 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 294 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 13852 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 729 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 36025 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7413 | | Single-Core | 2177 | 1644 | | Multi-Core | 70650 | 52845 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7413 | | Single-Core | 2319 | 1341 | | Multi-Core | 45439 | 41847 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7413 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.65 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 24 | | Threads | 64 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 62000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 180 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000792
100-100000792WOF | 100-000000323
100-100000323WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 31% better than EPYC 7413 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9374F has 8 more core than EPYC 7413. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 34
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7413 is better: 1
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 7413 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7413 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
