|
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9334 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9334 and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, 3DMark, Gears 5, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, SuperPi. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9334 | 70% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 1% better than EPYC 9334. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9334 | 75% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Control, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.3 | 132.6 | Valorant | 152.7 | 150.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 84.4 | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 141.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 113.0 | Overwatch | 123.7 | 122.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 104.0 | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 75.3 | Warzone | 119.1 | 117.5 | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 126.6 | Valheim | 126.7 | 125.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9334 | 35% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9374F as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 210W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 156 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 8366 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 334 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 17782 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 896 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 46317 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Single-Core | 2177 | 2073 | Multi-Core | 70650 | 67962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Single-Core | 2319 | 2209 | Multi-Core | 45439 | 43703 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 210 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | 100-000000800 100-100000800WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 29% better than EPYC 9334 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 1 The summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9334 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|