|
AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 9374F |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 9374F and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Furmark, 3DMark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB, WPrime, 7zip, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9374F or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7473X | 67% |
EPYC 9374F | 71% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 5% better than EPYC 7473X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7473X | 74% |
EPYC 9374F | 76% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 130.7 | 134.3 | Valorant | 148.5 | 152.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 85.5 | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 143.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 114.5 | Overwatch | 120.3 | 123.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 105.3 | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 76.3 | Warzone | 115.8 | 119.1 | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 128.2 | Valheim | 123.3 | 126.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7473X | 20% |
EPYC 9374F | 24% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7473X since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 9374F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 8716 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 371 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 18501 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 954 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 48156 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 9374F | Single-Core | 1812 | 2177 | Multi-Core | 58245 | 70650 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 9374F | Single-Core | 1489 | 2319 | Multi-Core | 41864 | 45439 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 9374F | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | Core name | Milan | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | Generation | 3 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.85 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 320 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000507 100-000000507​WOF | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 27% better than EPYC 7473X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9374F has 8 more core than EPYC 7473X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 32 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7473X and AMD EPYC 9374F before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|