AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7313

Processor comparisons   13-03-2023
   For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7313 and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like RealBench, Furmark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, SuperPi, AIDA64, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Overwatch
Last Man Standing
DOOM: Eternal
Halo Infinite
Valorant
Death Stranding
Fortnite
Borderlands 3
Fallout 76
Red Dead Redemption 2
Cyberpunk 2077
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Rainbow Six Siege
Valheim
Watch Dogs Legion
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Grand Theft Auto V
Apex Legends

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or AMD EPYC 9374F.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 9374F

71%

EPYC 7313

62%

This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 12% better than EPYC 7313. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 9374F

76%

EPYC 7313

68%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	134.3	120.0
Valorant	152.7	136.4
Cyberpunk 2077	85.5	76.4
Apex Legends	143.5	128.2
Call of Duty Warzone	114.5	102.3
Overwatch	123.7	110.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	105.3	94.1
DOOM Eternal	76.3	68.2
Warzone	119.1	106.4
Assassin's Creed	128.2	114.6
Valheim	126.7	113.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 9374F

24%

EPYC 7313

30%

To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9374F as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 9374F	AMD EPYC 7313
Cinbench 15 Single-core	184	124
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	8716	5029
Cinbench 20 Single-core	371	229
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	18501	10661
Cinbench 23 Single-core	954	564
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	48156	27719

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9374F	AMD EPYC 7313
Single-Core	2177	1268
Multi-Core	70650	40658

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9374F	AMD EPYC 7313
Single-Core	2319	1399
Multi-Core	45439	31411

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 9374F	AMD EPYC 7313
Announcement date	November 10, 2022	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP5	SP3
Core name	Genoa	Milan
Architecture	Zen 4	Zen 3
Generation	4	3
Turbo Frequency	4.3 MHz	3.7 MHz
Frequency	3.85 MHz	3 MHz
Cores	32	16
Threads	64	32
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	64000 millions	54000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	320 W	155 W
Memory type	DDR5	DDR4
Max. Memory	4096 Gb
Memory Frequency	4800	3200
Memory bandwidth	460.8 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	128MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number	100-000000792 100-100000792WOF	100-000000329 100-100000329WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 22% better than EPYC 7313 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9374F has 16 more core than EPYC 7313. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 34
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 1
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 7313 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 9374F - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 9374F specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7313 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7313 specs and review.