AMD EPYC 7F32 vs Intel Core i7-10875H

Processor comparisons   17-03-2021
   Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7F32 vs Intel Core i7-10875H and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, RealBench, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Furmark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:

Apex Legends
Borderlands 3
Death Stranding
Fortnite
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Watch Dogs Legion
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Last Man Standing
Valheim
Halo Infinite
DOOM: Eternal
Grand Theft Auto V
Rainbow Six Siege
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Red Dead Redemption 2
Cyberpunk 2077
Valorant
Fallout 76
Overwatch

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10875H or AMD EPYC 7F32.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7F32

56%

Core i7-10875H

54%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F32 is 3% better than Core i7-10875H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7F32

61%

Core i7-10875H

55%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	108.2	97.2
Valorant	122.9	110.5
Cyberpunk 2077	68.8	61.9
Apex Legends	115.5	103.8
Call of Duty Warzone	92.2	82.8
Overwatch	99.6	89.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	84.8	76.2
DOOM Eternal	61.5	55.2
Warzone	95.9	86.2
Assassin's Creed	103.3	92.8
Valheim	102.0	91.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7F32

22%

Core i7-10875H

106%

To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10875H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F32 as it consumes less power: 180W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7F32	Intel Core i7-10875H
Cinbench 15 Single-core	67	212
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	2750	1563
Cinbench 20 Single-core	446	506
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	5829	3569
Cinbench 23 Single-core	308	1166
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	15159	11389

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7F32	Intel Core i7-10875H
Single-Core	2422	2864
Multi-Core	22236	15944

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7F32	Intel Core i7-10875H
Single-Core	1209	1437
Multi-Core	19778	9026

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 7F32	Intel Core i7-10875H
Announcement date	October 01, 2020	April 01, 2020
Type	Server	Laptop
Socket	SP3	FCBGA1440
Core name	Rome	Comet Lake
Architecture	Zen 2	x86
Generation	2	10
Turbo Frequency	3.9 MHz	5.1 MHz
Frequency	3.7 MHz	2.3 MHz
Cores	8	8
Threads	16	16
Bus rate		8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	38000 millions	6800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	180 W	45 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4-2933
Max. Memory		128 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth		45.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	128MB	16 MB
Overclocking	Yes	Yes
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-000000139 100-000000139WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F32 is 37% better than Core i7-10875H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F32 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10875H is better: 12
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7F32 and Intel Core i7-10875H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

• AMD EPYC 7F32 specs and review.

• Intel Core i7-10875H specs and review.