|
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9354 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9354 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Handbrake, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9354 | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 1% better than EPYC 9354. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9354 | 75% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.3 | 133.0 | Valorant | 152.7 | 151.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 84.6 | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 142.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 113.4 | Overwatch | 123.7 | 122.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 104.3 | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 75.6 | Warzone | 119.1 | 117.9 | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 127.0 | Valheim | 126.7 | 125.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9354 | 26% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9374F since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 165 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 8452 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 346 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 17956 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 913 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 46758 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354 | Single-Core | 2177 | 2101 | Multi-Core | 70650 | 68605 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354 | Single-Core | 2319 | 2238 | Multi-Core | 45439 | 44119 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 3.25 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | 100-000000798 100-100000798WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 15% better than EPYC 9354 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354 is better: 1 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9354 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9354 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|