 |
AMD EPYC 9454 vs AMD EPYC 9374F |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9454 vs AMD EPYC 9374F and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, AIDA64, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, Prime95, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, VeraCrypt.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9374F or AMD EPYC 9454.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9454 | 74% |
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454 is 4% better than EPYC 9374F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9454 | 81% |
EPYC 9374F | 76% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 143.4 | 134.3 | | Valorant | 163.0 | 152.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 91.3 | 85.5 | | Apex Legends | 153.2 | 143.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 122.2 | 114.5 | | Overwatch | 132.0 | 123.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 112.5 | 105.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 81.5 | 76.3 | | Warzone | 127.1 | 119.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 136.9 | 128.2 | | Valheim | 135.3 | 126.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9454 | 18% |
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454 as it consumes less power: 290W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9374F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 215 | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9941 | 8716 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 428 | 371 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 21096 | 18501 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1093 | 954 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54903 | 48156 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9374F | | Single-Core | 2487 | 2177 | | Multi-Core | 80546 | 70650 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9374F | | Single-Core | 1569 | 2319 | | Multi-Core | 54343 | 45439 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9374F | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 3.85 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 32 | | Threads | 96 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000478
100-100000478WOF | 100-000000792
100-100000792WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 28% better than EPYC 9454 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454 has 16 more core than EPYC 9374F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 3
However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9454 and AMD EPYC 9374F before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9454 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
