|
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7543P |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 7543P tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, SuperPi, Prime95, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Handbrake, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Blender, 7zip, RealBench, Blender, Furmark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543P or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 7543P | 68% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 4% better than EPYC 7543P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 7543P | 67% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.3 | 119.6 | Valorant | 152.7 | 136.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 76.1 | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 127.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 102.0 | Overwatch | 123.7 | 110.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 93.8 | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 68.0 | Warzone | 119.1 | 106.0 | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 114.2 | Valheim | 126.7 | 112.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 7543P | 19% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7543P since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 182 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 7497 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 341 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 15890 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 840 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 41322 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 2177 | 1769 | Multi-Core | 70650 | 60614 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Single-Core | 2319 | 1306 | Multi-Core | 45439 | 31025 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 7543P | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | 100-000000341 100-100000341WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 27% better than EPYC 7543P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 2 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 7543P before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7543P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|