|
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9534 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9534 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AIDA64, PassMark, 7zip, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Prime95, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, MATLAB, Gears 5, SuperPi, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9534 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 16% better than EPYC 9374F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.3 | 151.1 | Valorant | 152.7 | 171.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 96.1 | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 161.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 128.8 | Overwatch | 123.7 | 139.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 118.5 | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 85.8 | Warzone | 119.1 | 133.9 | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 144.2 | Valheim | 126.7 | 142.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9534 | 17% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9534 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 352 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 14288 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 657 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 30279 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 1604 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 78728 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9534 | Single-Core | 2177 | 3375 | Multi-Core | 70650 | 115485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9534 | Single-Core | 2319 | 1450 | Multi-Core | 45439 | 61831 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9534 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.45 MHz | Cores | 32 | 64 | Threads | 64 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 108000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000792 100-100000792WOF | 100-000000799 100-100000799WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 36% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 32 more core than EPYC 9374F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9534 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|