|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs Samsung Exynos 9810 |
|
Comparisons 01-08-2021 Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs Samsung Exynos 9810, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx or Exynos 9810.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8cx | 25% |
Exynos 9810 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8cx | 73% |
Exynos 9810 | 63% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8cx | 23% |
Exynos 9810 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8cx |
Exynos 9810 | Total score | 358168 | 214536 | CPU | 100295 | 60078 | GPU | 136104 | 81523 | MEM | 57306 | 34334 | UX | 64475 | 38617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8cx |
Exynos 9810 | Single-Core | 748 | 442 | Multi-Core | 2837 | 1770 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8cx |
Exynos 9810 | Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.84 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.9 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 68 | 26.82 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | | L2 cache | 768 KB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9810 is 2% better than Snapdragon 8cx in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 680 | Mali-G72 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | 519.97 | # of Cores | | 18 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.3 | 19.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.4 | 39.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.6 | 45.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.4 | 35.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.6 | 34.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 70.6 | 49.9 | Real Racing 3 | 67.3 | 79.8 | Sniper 3D | 72.2 | 73 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.5 | 63.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.4 | 73 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 50.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 390 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE modem | LTE Cat.13/18 2/5 CA | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9810 is better: 13 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8cx SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
Exynos 9810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|