|
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus vs Atom x5-Z8350 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350, compare of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) and Adreno 512. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is quad-core (Kryo 280) and Atom x5-Z8350 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Octane V2, Neocore, Vellamo, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus or Atom x5-Z8350 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 8% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 56% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 6% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Total score | 113847 | 59881 | CPU | 31874 | 16771 | GPU | 43265 | 22756 | MEM | 18217 | 9586 | UX | 20499 | 10778 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Single-Core | 232 | 155 | Multi-Core | 1024 | 697 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1440 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 280 | 4x1.4-1.9 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 29.8 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is 34% better than Atom x5-Z8350 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 512 | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 255 | 96 | # of Cores | | 16 | # of Shader Units | 128 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 22.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 43.2 | 12.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 46.5 | 21.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.5 | 13.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 39.3 | 9.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 57.8 | 13.2 | Real Racing 3 | 58.1 | 37.1 | Sniper 3D | 74.4 | 33.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 65.1 | 29.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 74.4 | 33.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.2 | 29.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is better: 4 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Atom x5-Z8350 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|