|
Qualcomm QCS2290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm QCS2290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy QCS2290 or Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS2290 | 5% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS2290 | 70% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS2290 | 2% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 6% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS2290 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Total score | 70128 | 113847 | CPU | 19642 | 31874 | GPU | 26648 | 43265 | MEM | 11228 | 18217 | UX | 12627 | 20499 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS2290 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Single-Core | 181 | 232 | Multi-Core | 817 | 1024 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS2290 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 280 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 29.8 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is 9% better than QCS2290 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | Adreno 512 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 255 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 768 | 128 | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 22.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.7 | 43.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 25.2 | 46.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 24.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.7 | 39.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.9 | 57.8 | Real Racing 3 | 32.5 | 58.1 | Sniper 3D | 56.6 | 74.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.3 | 65.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 28.4 | 74.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.9 | 51.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 120 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 60 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, GLONASS, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS2290 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is better: 30 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|