|
Kirin 659 vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and Adreno 512. This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 659 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is quad-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like PassMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 659 or Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 659 | 5% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 659 | 52% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 659 | 3% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 6% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 659 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Total score | 75358 | 113847 | CPU | 21107 | 31874 | GPU | 28630 | 43265 | MEM | 12052 | 18217 | UX | 13572 | 20499 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 659 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Single-Core | 195 | 232 | Multi-Core | 877 | 1024 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 659 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Frequency | 2360 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 280 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 29.8 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 659 is 6% better than Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 659 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T830 MP2 | Adreno 512 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 61.2 | 255 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 22.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 17.1 | 43.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 28.6 | 46.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 19.5 | 24.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 14.6 | 39.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.2 | 57.8 | Real Racing 3 | 50.1 | 58.1 | Sniper 3D | 62.9 | 74.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 40 | 65.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 41.5 | 74.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 34.3 | 51.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 659 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is better: 30 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 659 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MT6750T • Vs MT6750 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|