|
Unisoc Tiger T603 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
|
Comparisons 06-11-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Unisoc Tiger T603 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Tiger T603 or MediaTek Dimensity 7050.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T603 | 9% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 40% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T603 | 71% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T603 | 6% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 37% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T603 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Total score | 215040 | 617016 | CPU | 60202 | 172759 | GPU | 81708 | 234461 | MEM | 34399 | 98726 | UX | 38709 | 111058 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T603 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Single-Core | 382 | 989 | Multi-Core | 1486 | 3441 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T603 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is 30% better than Tiger T603 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MC4 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 332.53 | 686 | # of Cores | 1 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 20.4 | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 40.1 | 69.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 46.9 | 95.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 36.6 | 53.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.9 | 59.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 50.6 | 87.4 | Real Racing 3 | 81.3 | 191.4 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 210.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.6 | 153.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 74.4 | 153.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.7 | 134.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 2000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T603 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 36 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T603 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|