 |
Unisoc Tiger T603 vs Qualcomm QCM5430 |
|
Comparisons 06-11-2023 Full compare data of Unisoc Tiger T603 vs Qualcomm QCM5430, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tiger T603 or QCM5430.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T603 |
QCM5430 | Total score | 215040 | 585984 | CPU | 60202 | 164069 | GPU | 81708 | 222675 | MEM | 34399 | 93766 | UX | 38709 | 105471 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T603 |
QCM5430 | Single-Core | 382 | 910 | Multi-Core | 1486 | 3310 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T603 |
QCM5430 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2700 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | 5200 millions | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 2x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 3x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 4666 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM5430 is 33% better than Tiger T603 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Tiger T603 has -2 more core than QCM5430. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 642L | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 550 MHz | GFloPS | 332.53 | 906.58 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 20.4 | 26.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 40.1 | 66.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 46.9 | 91.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 36.6 | 50.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.9 | 57.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 50.6 | 84.7 | Real Racing 3 | 81.3 | 114.3 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 146.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.6 | 128.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 74.4 | 119.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.7 | 119.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | Modem QCM6490 5G | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1600 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, GPS, GBeidou, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T603 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM5430 is better: 37 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T603 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
QCM5430 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|