|
Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 |
|
Comparisons 26-08-2021 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs HiSilicon Kirin 810, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy T740 Tanggula or Kirin 810.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT740 Tanggula | 17% |
Kirin 810 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T740 Tanggula | 68% |
Kirin 810 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT740 Tanggula | 15% |
Kirin 810 | 15% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T740 Tanggula |
Kirin 810 | Total score | 243859 | 244271 | CPU | 68270 | 68392 | GPU | 92672 | 92828 | MEM | 39021 | 39092 | UX | 43885 | 43972 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T740 Tanggula |
Kirin 810 | Single-Core | 503 | 503 | Multi-Core | 2012 | 2015 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T740 Tanggula |
Kirin 810 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2270 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.27 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 32 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 810 is 11% better than T740 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 204 | 426 | # of Cores | 3 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | 28.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 32.1 | 32.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.3 | 58.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.2 | 39.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 24.1 | 24.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 37.1 | 37.6 | Real Racing 3 | 72.6 | 73 | Sniper 3D | 93.6 | 93.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.4 | 81.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 93.2 | 93.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 69.3 | 70.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | 21 | Download speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 1400 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 750 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T740 Tanggula is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 810 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T740 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Kirin 810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
| |
|