MediaTek MT6753 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6753 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP3 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6753 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 650 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Vellamo, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT6753 or Kirin 650 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6753

Kirin 650

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6753

25%

Kirin 650

50%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6753

Kirin 650

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6753	Kirin 650
Total score	37157	51180
CPU	10397	14339
GPU	14113	19441
MEM	5954	8184
UX	6688	9208

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6753	Kirin 650
Single-Core	98	132
Multi-Core	454	596

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6753	Kirin 650
Frequency	1500 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	933
Memory bandwidth	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 650 is 25% better than MT6753 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP3	Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	35.7	61.2
# of Cores	3	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.5	17.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	30.9	43.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.5	29.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.8	26.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	25.2	36.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	37.4	54.9
Real Racing 3	29.3	59.8
Sniper 3D	25.4	47.8
Need for Speed No Limits	35.1	41.9
Mortal Kombat X	28.3	43.4
CSR Racing 2	25.4	38.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6753 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 650 is better: 28
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6753 and Kirin 650, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6753 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6753 specs and review.

Kirin 650 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 650 specs and review.