Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

Comparisons   17-02-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy QCS8250 or Snapdragon 678.


 
Qualcomm QCS8250
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
QCS825049% Snapdragon 67815%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
QCS825077% Snapdragon 67864%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
QCS825048% Snapdragon 67812%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
QCS8250 Snapdragon 678
Total score683050216174
CPU19126260533
GPU25954882148
MEM10928534589
UX12295638911

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
QCS8250 Snapdragon 678
Single-Core1073348
Multi-Core37561207

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
QCS8250 Snapdragon 678
Frequency2850 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.85 GHz Kryo 585 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver
8x2.0 GHz Kryo 460
Power consumption (TDP)10 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4xLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory16 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency27501866
Memory bandwidth4414.9
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache512 KB16 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS8250 is 29% better than Snapdragon 678 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 612
GPU Frequency645 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS1348398
# of Cores
# of Shader Units512256
Display3840 x 2160 pixels1080 x 2520 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.420.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)82.741.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra49.246.6
Call of Duty: Mobile44.436.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)69.635.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition101.550.8
Real Racing 386.581.6
Sniper 3D64.960.6
Need for Speed No Limits59.283.9
Mortal Kombat X65.374.6
CSR Racing 260.965.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution64 MP25 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 480Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolution8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5GQualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed7500 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed3000 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSSGalileo, GLONASS, SBAS, GPS, Beidou, QZSS
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS8250 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 is better: 7
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS8250 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 678 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


QCS8250 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Apple A11 Bionic
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Apple A10 Fusion
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080


Snapdragon 678 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands